Investigation of Morning-Evening Orientation in Six Countries Using the Preferences Scale
By Carlla S. Smith, S. Folkard, R. Schmieder, L. F. Parra, E. Spelten, Helena Almiral, R. Sen, S. Sahu, L. Pérez, J. Tisak. 2002
219 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/146f87d55e3deeb3cecb87f38f26cc5174185b9e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Christoph Randler
- Ioannis Tsaousis
- Juan F. Díaz-Morales
- Ana Adan
- M. Hidalgo
- S. Archer
- L. Di Milia
- Vincenzo Natale
Citations in the corpus
- Circadian Typology: A Comprehensive Review (2012, methodology): “Preferences Scale, CTQ and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire The Preferences Scale (PS) was developed to address several concerns over the CSM (Smith et al., 2002).”
- Life between Clocks: Daily Temporal Patterns of Human Chronotypes (2003, unknown): “, “I get up later than most people”) (Smith et al., 2002), or they ask subjects to assess hypothetical situations (e.”
- A validation of the revised circadian type inventory in a working sample (2005, methodology): “Further psychometric and validation studies are encouraged to support or counter the present findings and especially in different cultural settings (Bohle et al., 2001; Smith et al., 2002).”
- Morningness in German and Spanish students: a comparative study (2007, background): “Smith et al. (2002) found differences in scale means between countries and suggested a kind of climatic gradient, thus indicating that environmental factors may provide some explanation for differences between cultures.”
- Correlation between morningness – eveningness and final school leaving exams (2006, methodology): “Other circadian typology questionnaires have better psychometric properties, e.g. the Basic Language Morningness Scale BALM (Brown 1993), the Composite Scale of Morningness CSM (Smith et al. 1989) or the Early/Late-Preference Scale (Smith et al. 2002).”
- Circadian preferences and personality traits: A meta‐analysis (2010, background): “On the other hand, cultural differences exist but are mediated by social and environmental factors (e.g. Caci et al., 2005; Randler & Dı̀az-Morales, 2007; Smith et al., 2002).”
- Psychometric properties of the German version of the Composite Scale of Morningness (2008, methodology): “…e.g. the Composite Scale of Morningness (Smith et al. 1989), the Basic Language Morningness Scale (Brown 1993), the Circadian Type Inventory (Di Milia et al. 2005), the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (Zavada et al. 2005) and the Early/Late Preference Scale (Bohle et al. 2001; Smith et al. 2002).”
- An Actigraphic Validation Study of Seven Morningness- Eveningness Inventories (2012, methodology): “The Early/Late Preference Scale consists of 12 items aimed at measuring the subject’s perception of his or her own diurnal preferences relative to those of other people.”