CONTRASTING GALAXY FORMATION FROM QUANTUM WAVE DARK MATTER, ψDM, WITH ΛCDM, USING PLANCK AND HUBBLE DATA

By Hsi-Yu Schive, Tzihong Chiueh, T. Broadhurst, Kuan-Wei Huang. 2015

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The newly established luminosity functions (LFs) of high-z galaxies at 4 ≲ z ≲ 10 can provide a stringent check on dark matter models that aim to explain the core properties of dwarf galaxies. The cores of dwarf spheroidal galaxies are understood to be too large to be accounted for by free streaming of warm dark matter without overly suppressing the formation of such galaxies. Here we demonstrate with cosmological simulations that wave dark matter, &psgr; DM ?> , appropriate for light bosons such as axions, does not suffer from this problem, given a boson mass of m &psgr; ≥ 1.2 × 10 − 22 eV ?> (2σ). In this case, the halo mass function is suppressed below ∼ 10 10 M ☉ ?> at a level that is consistent with the high-z LFs, while simultaneously generating the kiloparsec-scale cores in dwarf galaxies arising from the solitonic ground state in &psgr; DM ?> . We demonstrate that the reionization history in this scenario is consistent with the Thomson optical depth recently reported by Planck, assuming a reasonable ionizing photon production rate. We predict that the LF should turn over slowly around an intrinsic ultraviolet luminosity of M UV ≳ − 16 ?> at z ≳ 4 ?> . We also show that for galaxies magnified > 10 × ?> in the Hubble Frontier Fields, &psgr; DM ?> predicts an order of magnitude fewer detections than cold dark matter at z ≳ 10 ?> down to M UV ∼ − 15 ?> , allowing us to distinguish between these very different interpretations for the observed coldness of dark matter.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/146f798f99211433695e1f7ba34be8d3375d7bf1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. M. White
  8. S. Allen

In Instrumentation

  1. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  2. V. Belokurov
  3. M. White
  4. A. Mantz
  5. S. Allen
  6. N. Evans II
  7. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  8. M. Vogelsberger

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. N. Palanque-Delabrouille
  2. C. Yéche
  3. S. Vagnozzi
  4. M. Viel
  5. E. di Valentino
  6. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  7. Julien Baur
  8. Eric Armengaud

Citations in the corpus