Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview.

By D. Pieper, sunya-lee Antoine, T. Mathes, E. Neugebauer, M. Eikermann. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014

987 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1464978d9129814bb03e04e2db211fb4787d3fee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. Leonard Reinecke
2. Adrian Meier

Citations in the corpus

• Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review (2020, background): “A common issue in meta-reviews is overlap , meaning that more weight is given to publications included in more than one review (Pieper et al., 2014).”