Competition and Growth

By Philippe Aghion, Rachel Griffith. 2005

363 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14586cd968c3aa762e33a8074de2910336f899b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. David B. Audretsch
2. Zoltan J. Acs
3. S. Roper
4. J. Love
5. David Urbano
6. E. Stam
7. P. Braunerhjelm
8. B. Carlsson

Citations in the corpus

• Do Product Market Regulations in Upstream Sectors Curb Productivity Growth? Panel Data Evidence For OECD Countries (2013, background): “4 For recent surveys, see Griffith and Harrison (2004), Aghion and Griffith (2005), Schiantarelli (2005), Crafts (2006), and Nicoletti and Scarpetta (2006).”
• Intellectual Property Rights Policy, Competition And Innovation (2011, background): “Should a firm with a large technology lead receive the same IPR protection as a company with a more limited technological lead, or should IPR policy be coupled with antitrust and used to limit the monopoly power of technology leaders?”
• Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database* (2009, unknown): “EU KLEMS data can also be combined with data from other sources to consider relationships between competition, education, R&D, innovation and growth (examples include Griffith et al., 2004; Aghion et al., 2005; Vandenbussche et al., 2006; Aghion and Griffith, 2005; Inklaar et al., 2008).”
• Externalities of openness in innovation (2013, background): “Tougher competition from open innovators may increase a firm’s own incentive to invest in innovation inputs or become more open (Aghion and Griffith 2005, Aghion et al. 2009, Leibenstein 1966, Vickers 1995).”
• How Valuable Is FinTech Innovation? (2019, unknown): “…(see, e.g., Lieberman and Montgomery 1988; Henderson and Cockburn 1996; Christensen 1997; Adner 2012) and how incumbents can use their own innovation to protect themselves from outside threats (see Dasgupta and Stiglitz 1980; Gilbert and Newbery 1982; Aghion et al. 2001; Aghion and Griffith 2005).”
• Cash Holdings, Competition, and Innovation (2016, unknown): “There is a large theoretical industrial organization literature modeling strategic interactions among innovative firms (e.g., Scherer (1967), Dasgupta and Stiglitz (1980), Reinganum (1982), Harris and Vickers (1987), and Aghion and Griffith (2005) among many others).”
• When Necessity Becomes a Virtue: The Effect of Product Market Competition on Corporate Social Responsibility (2010, background): “These ambiguous results arise because there are two main effects of product market competition on a given strategy: the “rent dissipation” effect and the “escape competition” effect (Aghion and Griffith, 2005), with opposite signs.”
• The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth (2010, background): “4 This was to some extent remedied in the second generation of endogenous growth models (Segerstrom et al. 1990, Segerstrom 1991, Aghion and Howitt 1992, 1998a, b, 2005, Cheng and Dinopoulos 1992, Segerstrom 1998, Aghion and Griffith 2005).”
• Product Market Regulation and Macroeconomic Performance: A Review of Cross Country Evidence (2005, unknown): “Vickers (1997), Aghion, Harris, Howitt, Vickers (2001), Aghion, Bloom, Blundell, Griffith and Howitt (2002), Aghion, Burgess, Redding and Zilibotti (2003), Aghion, Blundell, Griffith, Howitt and Prantl (2003), Aghion and Griffith (2005)) incumbents are”
• Dual Economies and International Total Factor Productivity Differences: Channelling the Impact from Institutions, Trade, and Geography (2008, background): “In Column (3) we have only non OECD countries and in Column (4) we have only OECD countries.”
• The value of intellectual property rights to firms and society (2007, background): “Even so, explorations of the role of market structure have continued: Aghion and Griffith (2005) have offered empirical evidence to support their hypothesis of an inverted U-shaped relationship between the degree of competition and the rate of innovation.”
• A Minimum of Rivalry: Evidence from Transition Economies on the Importance of Competition for Innovation and Growth (2004, background): “A survey of models from both traditions is provided in Aghion and Griffith (2004).”