Toward a Taxonomy of Essential Evaluator Competencies

By J. King, L. Stevahn, Gail Ghere, Jane Minnema. 2001

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/144399853c60e1e5a1043919ed4a9dfd5c38273f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Daniela C. Schröter
2. J. King
3. L. Stevahn
4. Jane Minnema
5. Gail Ghere

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Daniela C. Schröter
2. J. King
3. L. Stevahn
4. Jane Minnema
5. Gail Ghere

Citations in the corpus

• Establishing Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators (2005, methodology): “ King et al. (2001) with the standards, principles, and skills endorsed by major evaluation associations in North America (described above) revealed a need to make the essential evaluator competencies more comprehensive.”
• Evaluator Competencies (2008, background): “As shown in Table 1, most of the 19 competencies also were present in the Stufflebeam and Wingate (2005) and King and colleagues (Ghere King, Stevahn, & Minnema, 2006; King et al., 2001; Stevahn, King, Ghere, & Minnema, 2005, 2006) competency frameworks.”