Rock Magnetism: Fundamentals and Frontiers
By J. Geissman. 2002
777 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics, Molecular Biology, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13fbe673a51b2f4d0c8d85c4ea9a4f43399d623d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
In Molecular Biology
In Physiology
Citations in the corpus
- A Critical Appraisal of the “Day” Diagram (2017, background): “Both Bc and Bcr are also sensitive to domain state variations when particles are larger (or smaller) than the stable SD threshold size (Figures 2b and 2c) (e.g., Dunlop & Özdemir, 1997; Heider et al., 1996; Hunt et al., 1995; Maher, 1988; Nagata, 1961).”
- Properties of intracellular magnetite crystals produced by Desulfovibrio magneticus strain RS-1 (2006, background): “4 A m(2)/kg value for pure magnetite [27], the magnetite content by mass of cells is 0.”
- Increasing the efficiency of paleointensity analyses by selection of samples using first-order reversal curve diagrams (2006, background): “…for SD grains will be S-shaped where there is an initial plateau with negligible demagnetization and an inflexion point at intermediate fields; the coercivity spectrum changes to an exponential decay curve as grain size increases from the SD to the large MD state [Dunlop and Özdemir, 1997].”
- Records of an ancient Martian magnetic field in ALH84001 (2001, methodology): “Such a ¢eld is unlikely to have been that of the Sun, the solar wind, or other planets, whose total intensity is not thought to have been much larger than the present value (several nT) at Mars’ current orbit 4 Ga [27].”
- Resolving the Origin of Pseudo‐Single Domain Magnetic Behavior (2017, background): “PSDmoments were not considered to be independent of MD processes in these early models (Dunlop & Özdemir, 1997); later explanations emphasized true SD moments within PSD particles, where SD moments can reverse independently of surrounding domains (Dunlop, 1973, 1977) or where domain walls fail to…”
- A simple test for the presence of multidomain behavior during paleointensity experiments (2011, background): “Only two samples (MGH1 and Yu_s1) fall within the SD grain size range for magnetite (∼0.03 – ∼0.08 mm) [Dunlop and Özdemir, 1997].”
- Environmental magnetism: Principles and applications (2012, background): “[21] For stoichiometric magnetite, TV is generally fixed at 120–122 K, but the amplitude of the magnetization decrease at TV is gradually depressed as grain size decreases from the MD to the SD state [Dunlop and Özdemir, 1997].”
- First-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams for pseudo-single-domain magnetites at high temperature (2002, background): “slightly higher than the 575-580°C of stoichiometric magnetite [20], again indicating a”
- Biomineralization, crystallography and magnetic properties of bullet-shaped magnetite magnetosomes in giant rod magnetotactic bacteria (2010, background): “59, respectively, indicating characteristic uniaxial SD (USD) particle behavior (Dunlop and Özdemir, 1997).”
- ArcheoInt: An upgraded compilation of geomagnetic field intensity data for the past ten millennia and its application to the recovery of the past dipole moment (2008, neutral): “…and intensity protocols have recently been developed to detect multidomain (MD) grains behavior which could bias the intensity determination [e.g., Dunlop and Ozdemir , 1997; Riisager and Riisager , 2001; Krasa et al. , 2003; Yu et al. , 2004; Leonhardt et al. , 2004], this information is not…”
- Off-axis electron holography of magnetotactic bacteria: magnetic microstructure of strains MV-1 and MS-1 (2001, background): “At room temperature, this transition should occur when the crystals are below approximately 20 to 35 nm in size (Dunlop & Özdemir, 1997; Bazylinski & Moskowitz, 1997).”
- Experimental Observation of Magnetosome Chain Collapse in Magnetotactic Bacteria: Sedimentological, paleomagnetic, and evolutionary implications (2006, neutral): “8×10 A/m (480 emu/cm, [42]).”