What is the “real” impact of invasive plant species?

By J. Barney, Daniel R. Tekiela, Eugene Sj Dollete, Bradley J. Tomasek. 2013

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13db830e632adcc65e91ce7d9701efc510c8923a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Jane A. Catford
2. Catherine S. Jarnevich
3. Y. Buckley
4. I. Pearse
5. H. Sofaer

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jane A. Catford

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Jane A. Catford
2. Y. Buckley
3. Catherine S. Jarnevich
4. I. Pearse
5. H. Sofaer

Citations in the corpus

• Does the biogeographic origin of species matter? Ecological effects of native and non‐native species and the use of origin to guide management (2016, background): “Figure 1 illustrates impact using either abundance or range, but a three-dimensional impact surface can also be constructed to show the impact at any combination of range and abundance (e.g. Barney et al. (2013)).”
• The relationship between invader abundance and impact (2018, background): “Despite the challenges, rigorous evaluations of the impacts of exotic species are important because the costs and benefits of established, emerging, and potential invaders will determine how we manage invasive species (Thiele et al. 2010, Barney et al. 2013, Kumschick 2015).”