Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems

By Elias G. Carayannis, D. J. Campbell. 2012

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13a410483c5a9436ae98f894f6dc23d79830ab5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Quadruple Helix Systems and Symmetry: a Step Towards Helix Innovation System Classification (2014, unknown): “Innovation system fractal structure, originated from actors non-linear relationships, somewhat resembles “Knowledge fractals” emphasizing the innovation system complexity (Carayannis and Campbell 2012).”
The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation (2012, background): “We want to refer here specifically the six currently existing models of knowledge creation and innovation creativity (see also Figure 1 and Carayannis and Campbell 2012, pp. 13–28) as follows: Mode 1 (Gibbons et al. 1994).”
Quadruple helix as a network of relationships: creating value within a Swedish regional innovation system (2019, background): “The quadruple helix framework places a stronger focus on cooperation in innovation within and across regional innovation systems (Carayannis and Campbell 2009, 2012) that could serve as the foundation for diverse smart specialization strategies (Carayannis et al. 2018).”
The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria (2015, unknown): “Carayannis and Campbell (2011) challenge the mode 2 approach for its neglect of institutions, systems, natural eco-system and environ- ment.”
Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations (2017, background): “The importance of the research area is evidenced by the fast-growing number of scholarly publications addressing the following: characteristics and motives of individuals engaged in the commercialisation of research, both from academia and industry, and their effects; characteristics and motives of ”