Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations
By Nivedita Mani, Kim Plunkett. 2007
191 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1391a6db130795f7e7597c6986a492eac50b1bc2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Janet F. Werker
- James L. Morgan
- Katherine S. White
- H. H. Yeung
- Joseph Butler
- David J. Lewkowicz
- Patricia K. Kuhl
- Takao K. Hensch
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Janet F. Werker
- James L. Morgan
- H. H. Yeung
- Katherine S. White
- Joseph Butler
- David J. Lewkowicz
- Ferran Pons
- Patricia K. Kuhl
Citations in the corpus
- Sub-Segmental Detail in Early Lexical Representations. (2008, background): “Mani and Plunkett (2007) did not manipulate distance explicitly, but included vowel mispronunciations of different sizes.”
- When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone (2013, result): “As has been shown with adults (e.g., New, Araújo, & Nazzi, 2008), as well as with infants and children (e.g., Havy & Nazzi, 2009; Mani & Plunkett , 2007; Nazzi, 2005), vowels are sometimes more confusable than consonants when accessing word forms.”
- Categorization of regional and foreign accent in 5- to 7-year-old British children (2009, background): “…view, Nazzi (2005) has demonstrated that young children perform better in a word learning task when the to-be-learned words contrast on consonants rather than on vowels (see also Nazzi & New, 2007; Nazzi, Floccia, Moquet, & Butler, in press; but see Mani & Plunkett, 2007, for a different view).”