The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: a review of the empirical evidence

By Jaume Masip, Siegfried L. Sporer, Eugenio Garrido, Carmen Herrero. 2005

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/138640a117b8e7f7661a6c5224f446246197426d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Aldert Vrij
2. R. Fisher
3. Sharon Leal
4. Samantha Mann
5. Maria Hartwig
6. Leanne ten Brinke
7. S. Porter
8. Pär Anders Granhag

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Aldert Vrij
2. Sharon Leal
3. R. Fisher

In Social Psychology

1. Aldert Vrij
2. R. Fisher
3. Sharon Leal
4. Samantha Mann
5. Maria Hartwig
6. Pär Anders Granhag
7. S. Porter
8. Leanne ten Brinke

Citations in the corpus

• ‘Look into my eyes’: can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? (2010, background): “Verbal lie detection tools that assess the number of details mentioned by interviewees, such as Criteria-Based Content Analysis (Vrij, 2005 ) and Reality Monitoring (RM) (Masip, Sporer, Garrido, & Herrero, 2005 ), distinguish between general categories of details and more specific types of details”
• Nonverbal Dominance Versus Verbal Accuracy in Lie Detection (2008, background): “Several reviews of CBCA (Vrij, 2005) and RM (Masip et al., 2005; Sporer, 2004) research have been published recently, but Vrij’s (2008) review is the most comprehensive to date.”