The Construction of Preference: Cognitive Processes in Preference Reversals
By D. Schkade, Eric J. Johnson. 2006
174 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1359b5ea6f1bec9bb77eb622e8bfa92c6a0c8dab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Alexander K. Wagner
- Ðura-Georg Granic
- Johannes Kern
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer
Citations in the corpus
- The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices Without Trade-Offs (2006, unknown): “…cognitive processes and inferences can be predicted by models of heuristics (e.g., Bröder, 2000; Bröder, 2003; Bröder & Schiffer, 2003; Dhami, 2003; Huber, 1982; Newell, Weston, & Shanks, 2003; Payne et al., 1993; Payne, Bettman, & Luce, 1996; Rieskamp & Hoffrage, 1999; Schkade & Johnson, 1989).”
- Preference reversals: Time and again (2016, background): “Furthermore, other forms of inconsistencies between different preference elicitation methods have been established in the literature, including reversals between pricing and rating (Schkade and Johnson 1989) as well as discrepancies between certainty and probability equivalents (Hershey and Schoemak”
- Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity (2005, unknown): “adjusting from that point based on additional information is an acknowledged strategy for tasks such as estimating monetary values (e.g., Schkade and Johnson, 1989 ).”