Indicators for Social Inclusion

By Tony Atkinson, B. Cantillon, Eric Marlier, B. Nolan. 2002

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/135493046e349d083539cfa7327b97eb4600191a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Kenneth Nelson
2. M. Matsaganis
3. R. Puertas
4. B. Cantillon
5. S. Alkire
6. L. Marti
7. M. Ferrera
8. S. Sacchi

Citations in the corpus

• Counteracting material deprivation: The role of social assistance in Europe (2012, background): “It is true that the fruitfulness of non-monetary poverty indicators was recognized in the leading scholarly work related to the process of developing common benchmarks to evaluate social development in the EU countries (Atkinson et al., 2002).”
• Open coordination against poverty: the new EU `social inclusion process' (2002, background): “However, unless the impact of national policies on poverty (and with some effort, on social exclusion) can be identified with reasonable confidence, the vagueness affecting this policy area will continue to be endemic (Atkinson et al., 2002; Tsakloglou, forthcoming).”
• Knowing what is good for you (2006, unknown): “The list of indicators was subject to academic scrutiny and discussion in relevant European policy making bodies (Atkinson et al. 2002, Social Protection Committee 2001).”
• Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index (2013, background): “Having roughly equal weights across dimensions also eases the interpretation of the index for policy (Atkinson et al. 2002).”
• The Case for an EU-wide Measure of Poverty (2006, background): “Hitherto, poverty in the EU has been defined and measured by reference to income thresholds defined at the level of each member state, independently of any consideration of inequalities in income between member states (Atkinson et al. 2002).”
• A Dea-Logistics Performance Index (2017, methodology): “Some authors remark that there are inherent benefits of applying DEA in the context of countries’ performance analysis as the method is based on the most favorable and country-specific weights (Atkinson et al. 2002; Cherchye et al. 2008).”
• The paradox of the social investment state: growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era (2011, background): “Poverty is a relative, multidimensional and graduated notion (Atkinson et al., 2002: 78).”