The Case for an EU-wide Measure of Poverty

By T. Fahey. 2006

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Welfare regime and social class variation in poverty and economic vulnerability in Europe: an analysis of EU-SILC (2009, methodology): “…counterintuitive and at odds with our knowledge of variation across the EU in objective living conditions and subjective feelings of deprivation (Fahey, 2007), Whelan and Maître (2009) using European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) to assess the case made by Fahey…”
Multidimensional poverty measurement in Europe: An application of the adjusted headcount approach (2014, background): “social exclusion, identified by Kakwani and Silber (2007) as the most important recent development in poverty research. This is reflected in the fact that the 2020 poverty and social reduction target adopted by the European Union (EU) in 2010 employs a multidimensional measure, combining three indic”
Multidimensional Poverty and Material Deprivation with Discrete Data (2013, unknown): “For a discussion of this point in the EU context, see, among others, Fahey (2007) and Whelan, Nolan and Mâıtre (2008).”