Observing Earthquakes Triggered in the Near Field by Dynamic Deformations

By J. Gomberg, P. Bodin, P. Reasenberg. 2003

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1327ec6b9b0dc5d50d068f57cac56b9b26ea5620

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

1. A. Freed
2. E. Brodsky
3. Massimo Cocco
4. N. V. Elst
5. Hiroo Kanamori
6. J. Gomberg
7. S. Toda
8. Sandy Steacy

Citations in the corpus

• The physics of earthquakes (2001, background): “Kilb et al (2000) and Gomberg et al (2003) demonstrated that for earthquakes with strong directivity, the aftershocks are better predicted by the dynamic than the static stress fields.”
• Introduction to special section: Stress transfer, earthquake triggering, and time‐dependent seismic hazard (2005, background): “A correlation between seismicity rate changes and rupture directivity has been noted in cases of triggering at remote distances [Mohamad et al., 2000; Gomberg et al., 2001; Kilb et al., 2002; Kilb, 2003; Gomberg et al., 2004] and in the near field [Gomberg et al., 2003].”
• Connecting near-field and far-field earthquake triggering to dynamic strain (2010, background): “Still other studies that compare near‐field aftershock locations to the static and dynamic strains for earthquakes with strong directivity conclude that dynamic strains correlate better with the ensuing seismicity [Gomberg et al., 2003; Kilb et al., 2000].”
• EARTHQUAKE TRIGGERING BY STATIC, DYNAMIC, AND POSTSEISMIC STRESS TRANSFER (2005, background): “If the dynamic stresses are greatest in this direction, and if dynamic stresses are a key mechanism of dynamic triggering, then seismicity rates following the earthquake should be greatest in line with the directivity (Gomberg et al. 2003).”
• Toggling of seismicity by the 1997 Kagoshima earthquake couplet: A demonstration of time-dependent stress transfer (2003, background): “The dynamic Coulomb stress changes, while spatially nonuniform, everywhere oscillate between positive and negative values [Kilb et al., 2000; Gomberg et al., 2001, 2003].”
• Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California : Animations built on earthquake stress transfer : Stress transfer, earthquake triggering, and time-dependent seismic hazard (2005, background): “Competing and complementary concepts of dynamic stress triggering [Kilb, 2003; Gomberg et al., 2003 ], pore fluid diffusion [Peltzer et al., 1996], and viscoelastic stress transfer [Pollitz et al., 2004] have also been explored to explain aftershock and postseismic geodetic deformation, but here we”