Toggling of seismicity by the 1997 Kagoshima earthquake couplet: A demonstration of time-dependent stress transfer

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California : Animations built on earthquake stress transfer : Stress transfer, earthquake triggering, and time-dependent seismic hazard (2005, background): “Some progress has also been achieved in explaining the time dependence of observed seismicity by Coulomb stress transfer in an elastic medium coupled with the concepts of Dieterich’s [1994] rate and state friction [Stein et al., 1997; Parsons et al., 1999; Toda and Stein, 2003].”
Introduction to special section: Stress transfer, earthquake triggering, and time‐dependent seismic hazard (2005, unknown): “Stress shadows also have been inferred in other studies [e.g., Parsons et al., 1999; Stein, 1999; Wyss and Wiemer, 2000; Ogata et al., 2003; Toda and Stein, 2003; Woessner et al., 2004].”
EARTHQUAKE TRIGGERING BY STATIC, DYNAMIC, AND POSTSEISMIC STRESS TRANSFER (2005, methodology): “Such theory has also been used to convert calculated Coulomb stress changes into time-dependent probability forecasts for triggered seismicity (Stein et al. 1997; Toda et al. 1998; Toda & Stein 2002, 2003; Parsons et al. 2000).”
Importance of small earthquakes for stress transfers and earthquake triggering (2004, background): “Assuming Aσn = 0.4 bar [Toda and Stein, 2003], this gives a maximum stress of 4.6 bar.”