The Research Game in Academic Life

By L. Lucas. 2006

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1322b4fbf1f7b4cc3338c88532f7a7a165892c39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Halse
2. Ka Ho Mok
3. R. Deem
4. J. Malfroy
5. L. Lucas
6. J. Lindén
7. Sheila S. Slaughter
8. Hugo Horta

Citations in the corpus

• Transforming Higher Education in Whose Image? Exploring the Concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia (2008, background): “If research in universities is not to be reduced to a form of game-playing (Lucas, 2006) and if all teaching is to be organized in similar ways, what happens to system and institutional diversity? Does it become simply a consolation prize for those who have no chance of achieving world-class status?”
• Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work (2010, background): “The transformation of the higher education landscape has triggered structural changes, new funding regimes, and stricter accountability and quality assurance requirements that have changed the nature of doctoral education and the work of doctoral supervisors, or advisers as they are known in some co”