Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices.

By G. Elwyn, A. Edwards, P. Kinnersley, R. Grol. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2000

799 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1320d6c4f4510c1853c36baa3df252bfb46aa84b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. D. Frosch
2. N. Joseph-Williams
3. R. Thomson
4. G. Makoul
5. Amy Lloyd
6. M. Barry
7. P. Kinnersley
8. A. Edwards

Citations in the corpus

• Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice (2012, background): “We illustrate the arguments in favor of SDM by providing two hypothetical cases where more than one reasonable treatment option exist—see cases 1 and 2.(12) They illustrate that informed preferences are an optimal goal because the decisions made will be better understood, based on more accurate expe”
• An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. (2006, background): “1% of 342) articles with conceptual definitions [1–7,10–18,21,23–28,38–158], and the secondary search strategy yielded 17 (22.”