The neuroscience of morality : emotion, brain disorders, and development

By Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2008

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12f6ae530685a0d28f25329c412c022149e111ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. V. Bavel
2. Molly J. Crockett
3. W. Brady
4. Gordon Pennycook

Citations in the corpus

• The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values (2014, unknown): “In contrast, Greene and colleagues have proposed an alternative model that affords analytic reasoning processes a larger role in determining moral judgement (Greene, 2007, 2012; Greene et al., 2001, 2004, 2008; Paxton & Greene, 2010).”
• The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online (2019, result): “This is in contrast to the type of moral reasoning that often requires greater deliberation and draws on different principles (Greene, 2008; Kohlberg, Levine, & Hewer, 1983).”