Dynamic rupture simulation of non-planar faults with a finite-difference approach

By V. Cruz‐Atienza, Jean Virieux. 2004

67 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12e12ae6bdad3b252f38320d596d2becfbd784c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

1. N. Lapusta
2. Yi Liu
3. Steven M. Day
4. L. Dalguer
5. Jean-Philippe Avouac
6. H. Noda
7. Y. Kaneko
8. Taras V. Gerya

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of finite difference and boundary integral solutions to three‐dimensional spontaneous rupture (2005, background): “These have been limited for the most part to faults consisting of planar segments, although a few recent solutions are for nonplanar faults [e.g., Cruz-Atienza and Virieux, 2004; Kase and Day, 2004; Zhang et al., 2004].”
• Comparison of Fault Representation Methods in Finite Difference Simulations of Dynamic Rupture (2006, methodology): “Numerous formulations have been used to solve the spontaneous rupture problem by the FD method (e.g., Andrews, 1976a,b, 1999; Madariaga, 1976; Day 1982a,b; Madariaga et al., 1998; Inoue and Miyatake, 1998; Cruz-Atienza and Virieux, 2004; Kase and Day, 2006), the finiteelement (FE) method (e.g., Og”