Comparison of Fault Representation Methods in Finite Difference Simulations of Dynamic Rupture

By L. Dalguer, Steven M. Day. 2006

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geophysics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0493163772e7b18f3d90f2b7ded24f430ce6a0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

1. M. Galis
2. Martin Balazovjech
3. P. Pazak
4. J. Kristek
5. P. Moczo
6. Gabriele Morra
7. Domenico Giardini
8. P. Martin Mai

In Ocean Engineering

1. P. Moczo
2. J. Kristek
3. M. Galis
4. Martin Balazovjech
5. P. Pazak
6. Taras V. Gerya
7. Andreas Fichtner

Citations in the corpus

• The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion (2007, methodology): “Dalguer and Day (2006) compared the TSN method with the thick-fault method of Madariaga et al. (1998) and the stress-glut method presented by Andrews (1999).”
• The seismic cycle at subduction thrusts: Insights from seismo‐thermo‐mechanical models (2013, methodology): “This is also observed for anelastic fault zone models used in dynamic rupture modeling [Dalguer and Day, 2006].”