ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGAL ABOVEGROUND COMMUNITY CHANGE OVER AN ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN DEPOSITION GRADIENT

By E. Lilleskov, T. Fahey, G. Lovett. 2001

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12c5fea45478c3109f78a4a72c701148646f843b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Nitrogen fertilization reduces diversity and alters community structure of active fungi in boreal ecosystems (2007, background): “In boreal forest and tundra ecosystems, anthropogenic N deposition is low compared to the rest of the globe (but see Lilleskov et al., 2001).”
Climate change feedbacks to microbial decomposition in boreal soils (2011, background): “Mycorrhizal fungi are particularly sensitive to N availability, and frequently decline in response to N deposition and fertilization (Arnolds 1991; Brandrud & Timmermann 1998; Lilleskov et al. 2001).”
Mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen fertilization in boreal ecosystems: potential consequences for soil carbon storage (2007, background): “We hypothesized that the abundance of AM and ECM fungi, as well as glomalin, should decline under N additions, because plants should allocate less carbon to their mycorrhizal fungi when N is more readily available (Lilleskov et al., 2001; Nilsson & Wallander, 2003).”
Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. (2008, background): “Ectomycorrhizal diversity frequently decreases following N fertilization or deposition (Arnolds 1991; Lilleskov et al. 2001, 2002; Peter et al. 2001; Frey et al. 2004), although belowground changes tend to be less pronounced than aboveground changes (Karen & Nylund 1997; Jonsson et al. 2000; Peter…”
Modeling the carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: Mycorrhizal trade‐offs and multipath resistance uptake improve predictions of retranslocation (2014, methodology): “In contrast to FUN 1.0, a sum instead of a product is used in these cost equations: Costactive ¼ KN=soil Nð Þ þ KC=fine root Cð Þ (3) This formulation enables the cost function to respond differentially to a change in either of the function parameters: KN and KC which control the cost as a function…”
Chronic nitrogen additions fundamentally restructure the soil fungal community in a temperate forest (2016, background): “…subsets of fungi, for example, mycorrhizal sporocarps or root tips (Arnolds, 1991; Dighton and Jansen, 1991; Egerton-Warburton and Allen, 2000; Lilleskov et al., 2001, 2002; Treseder, 2004; Parrent and Vilgalys, 2007; van Diepen et al., 2011), saprotrophic taxa (Allison et al., 2007), or…”
Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests (2004, background): “First, N addition reduces the number, species richness and composition of EMF fruiting bodies (Wallenda and Kottke, 1998 and references therein; Lilleskov et al., 2001).”
Nitrogen enrichment causes minimal changes in arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization but shifts community composition—evidence from rDNA data (2005, background): “Studies on ectomycorrhizal (EM) fruiting bodies have shown that some EM species are favored by N additions, whereas others may decline and disappear from the community (Avis et al. 2003; Lilleskov et al. 2001; Peter et al. 2001; Wallenda and Kottke 1998).”
Mycorrhizal mushroom diversity and productivity—an indicator of forest health? (2011, background): “…the species diversity and fruit-body production of ectomycorrhizal species, whereas saprobic species are much less affected (Ritter and Tölle 1978; Arnolds 1991; Wiklund et al. 1995; Wallenda and Kottke 1998; Lilleskov et al. 2001; Peter et al. 2001; Trudell and Edmonds 2004; Termorshuizen 1993).”
Microbial activity and soil respiration under nitrogen addition in Alaskan boreal forest (2008, background): “Earlier studies have shown that ectomycorrhizal communities in boreal forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive to N deposition (Arnolds, 1991; Lilleskov et al., 2001, 2002a, b).”