Plants and Productivity in International Trade

By Onathan, Aton, B. J, Radford, Ensen. 2003

3,525 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/129c03c968f58f85a9f7afeae38c2fdc1cc704a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Comparative Advantage and Hetero-geneous Firms (2004, background): “Other international trade models incorporating heterogeneous firms include Bernard, Eaton and Kortum (2003); Helpman, Melitz and Yeaple (2004); Melitz and Ottaviano (2005); and Yeaple (2005).”
Political Cleavages within Industry: Firm-level Lobbying for Trade Liberalization (2017, positive): “To analyze the political incentives of firms, I extend the theoretical framework of newnew trade theory (e.g., Bernard et al. 2003; Melitz 2003) to include political interaction between firms and government.”
Innovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade (2007, methodology): “The model we use in coming to this answer follows the recent literature on heterogeneous firms and international trade (e.g., Krugman 1980; Bernard et al. 2003; Melitz 2003; Helpman 2006).”
Markups and Firm-Level Export Status (2012, positive): “How can we explain our results? A few recent models (Bernard et al. 2003; Melitz and Ottaviano 2008) provide a theoretical analysis of the relationship between firm export status and (marketspecific) markups.”
Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan's FDI in the United States (2006, neutral): “6 This point has been made by many others, including Bernard et al. (2003).”
Export Variety and Country Productivity : Estimating the Monopolistic Competition Model with Endogenous Productivity (2008, background): “That approach is taken by Bernard et al (2003) for U.S. firms; Eaton, Kortum and Kramarz (2003, 2004) for French firms; Helpman, Melitz and Yeaple (2004) for U.S. multinationals operating abroad; and Demidova, Kee and Kala (2006) for Bangladeshi garment exporters.”
Distorted gravity: Heterogeneous Firms, Market Structure and the Geography of International Trade ∗ (2004, background): “(4) for the productivity threshold, Eq.”
Export‐market participation and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing (2003, neutral): “8 Changes in TFP reflect numerous influences such as technological change, economies of scales, changes in organization of production, and changes in mark-ups due to changes in import competition (Bernard et al. 2000).”
Productivity, exporting, and the learning‐by‐exporting hypothesis: direct evidence from UK firms (2008, positive): “In theory models e.g. of Bernard et al (2004) and Melitz (2003) ex ante more productive firms export and lowering of trade barriers raises aggregate productivity by shifting market share to such firms and away from less efficient firms.”
Trade and Investment under Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Firm Evidence (2015, background): “Starting with Bernard and Jensen (1995) an extensive literature has developed, which documents the fact that exporters tend to be larger and more e¢ cient than non-exporters and tend to self-select into exporting.”
Trade and Growth: Reconciling the Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Evidence (2005, positive): “of the output (Bernard et al., 2003; Melitz, 2003). The potential reallocation of resources across firms might be considerable. Bernard and Jensen (1999b), for example, find that more than 40% of total factor productivity (TFP) growth in the US manufacturing sector, during the period 1984–1992, resu”