On the Design of Optimization Strategies Based on Global Response Surface Approximation Models
By András Sóbester, Stephen J. Leary, Andy J. Keane. 2005
320 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Alexander I. J. Forrester
- Yew-Soon Ong
- Saman Razavi
- Donald H. Burn
- Bryan Tolson
- Andy J. Keane
- Carren M. E. Holden
- Jeff Schneider
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Alexander I. J. Forrester
- Saman Razavi
- Donald H. Burn
- Bryan Tolson
- Carren M. E. Holden
- Jeff Schneider
- James M. Parr
- Neil W. Bressloff
In Molecular Biology
- Alexander I. J. Forrester
- Donald H. Burn
- Bryan Tolson
- Saman Razavi
- Neil W. Bressloff
- David J. J. Toal
- Yew-Soon Ong
- Andy J. Keane
Citations in the corpus
- An evaluation of adaptive surrogate modeling based optimization with two benchmark problems (2014, background): “For example, S obester et al. (2005) suggested that about 35% of the samples should be spent in the initial stage, while Jones et al. (1998) recommended that the initial sample size should be about ten times the dimensionality of the problem.”
- Infill sampling criteria for surrogate-based optimization with constraint handling (2012, methodology): “To name a few: generalized expected improvement (Schonlau 1997, Sasena et al. 2002) and weighted expected improvement (Sóbester et al. 2005) assign different weightings to exploration and exploitation; quantile-based expected improvement (Picheny et al. 2010) deals with noisy experiments; and…”
- Numerical assessment of metamodelling strategies in computationally intensive optimization (2012, methodology): “Such ameasure is explicitly available in some metamodels, e.g., in polynomials, kriging (DACE), Gaussian Radial Basis Function models (Sobester et al., 2005), and smoothing spline ANOVA (Gu, 2002).”
- Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization (2009, methodology): “[73] used a weighted expected improvement formulation as part of a twostage approach to achieve similar ends, while Forrester [18] used a weighted statistical lower bound with reinforcement learning to chose the weighting.”
- Kriging Hyperparameter Tuning Strategies (2008, methodology): “[19], each of these budgets has one-third of the evaluations reserved for the initial design of experiments, with the remainder used in the update process.”
- A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design (2017, background): “Then it switches to (Sóbester et al. 2005) Depend on computing budget N = 0.5 N max (Aute et al. 2013) H. Liu et al. pure local exploitation in interesting regions for improving the model accuracy efficiently.”
- Using response surfaces and expected improvement to optimize snake robot gait parameters (2011, background): “This quality of the likelihood function causes simple search techniques, such as conjugate gradient, to often terminate early, or reach an incorrect local optimum.”
- Review of surrogate modeling in water resources (2012, methodology): “Although globally convergent 13 of 32 under some mild assumptions [Sobester et al., 2005], the framework solely using the approximation uncertainty would require impractically large number of original function evaluations, especially when the number of decision variables is more than a few.”