A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity

By D. Ning, Ye Deng, James M. Tiedje, Jizhong Zhou. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019

1,005 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Significance An ecological community is a dynamic complex system with a myriad of interacting species, which are controlled by various scale-dependent deterministic and stochastic forces. With rapid advances in genomics technologies, categorizing biological diversity, particularly microbial diversity, becomes relatively easy, but the great challenge is to disentangle the mechanisms controlling biological diversity. The general null model-based framework developed in this study provides an effective and robust tool to ecologists for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity. By highlighting the caveats such as model selection, similarity metrics, and spatial scales, this study provides guidance for appropriate use of null model-based approaches for examining community assembly processes. Although this framework was tested with microbial data, it should also be applicable to plant and animal ecology. Understanding the community assembly mechanisms controlling biodiversity patterns is a central issue in ecology. Although it is generally accepted that both deterministic and stochastic processes play important roles in community assembly, quantifying their relative importance is challenging. Here we propose a general mathematical framework to quantify ecological stochasticity under different situations in which deterministic factors drive the communities more similar or dissimilar than null expectation. An index, normalized stochasticity ratio (NST), was developed with 50% as the boundary point between more deterministic (<50%) and more stochastic (>50%) assembly. NST was tested with simulated communities by considering abiotic filtering, competition, environmental noise, and spatial scales. All tested approaches showed limited performance at large spatial scales or under very high environmental noise. However, in all of the other simulated scenarios, NST showed high accuracy (0.90 to 1.00) and precision (0.91 to 0.99), with averages of 0.37 higher accuracy (0.1 to 0.7) and 0.33 higher precision (0.0 to 1.8) than previous approaches. NST was also applied to estimate stochasticity in the succession of a groundwater microbial community in response to organic carbon (vegetable oil) injection. Our results showed that community assembly was shifted from more deterministic (NST = 21%) to more stochastic (NST = 70%) right after organic carbon input. As the vegetable oil was consumed, the community gradually returned to be more deterministic (NST = 27%). In addition, our results demonstrated that null model algorithms and community similarity metrics had strong effects on quantifying ecological stochasticity.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d53162741638140f8263ae98e20abc4e601ce92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Ji‐Zheng He
  2. Hangwei Hu
  3. B. A. Nguyen
  4. Chaoyu Li
  5. Zhen-Zhen Yan
  6. Yong Zheng
  7. Qing‐Lin Chen
  8. Yong-guan Zhu

In Genetics

  1. Yong-guan Zhu
  2. Ji‐Zheng He
  3. Hangwei Hu

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ji‐Zheng He
  2. Hangwei Hu
  3. B. A. Nguyen
  4. Chaoyu Li
  5. Zhen-Zhen Yan
  6. Yong Zheng
  7. Qing‐Lin Chen
  8. Yong-guan Zhu

Citations in the corpus