High connectivity of salmon farms revealed by aggregation, residence and repeated movements of wild fish among farms

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Attraction and repulsion of mobile wild organisms to finfish and shellfish aquaculture: a review (2018, background): “Other work has shown that feeding operations-related spatial distribution of fish are speciesspecific such that some species aggregate around feeding times but other species do not (Uglem et al. 2009, Arechavala-Lopez et al. 2010, Bacher et al. 2013).”
Impacts of marine and freshwater aquaculture on wildlife: a global meta-analysis (2018, unknown): “…may also act as reservoirs for parasites and diseases, and as they move between cages to take advantage of feeding opportunities, they act as potential transmission vectors that may increase reinfection rates for farms, driving positive feedbacks (Uglem et al. 2009; Hayward et al. 2011).”
Disease interaction and pathogens exchange between wild and farmed fish populations with special reference to Norway (2011, background): “The authors AC C EP TE D M AN U SC R IP T concluded that salmon farms should be considered to be connected through wild fish movements with regard to potential pathogen transmission (Uglem et al., 2009).”
Host density thresholds and disease control for fisheries and aquaculture (2010, background): “Furthermore, there may be mobile wild host populations in the surrounding environment that vary in abundance through time and space, and which can connect distant aquaculture facilities (Uglem et al. 2009).”