Feeding by the mixotrophic red-tide dinoflagellate Gonyaulax polygramma: mechanisms, prey species, effects of prey concentration, and grazing impact

By H. Jeong, Y. Yoo, K. Seong, Jong Hyeok Kim, Jae Yeon Park, Sanghee Kim, Seung Hyeon Lee, J. Ha, W. Yih. 2005

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12682b82eeed0e94762ff0e5ebff8bce7ded4435

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. H. Jeong
2. D. Stoecker
3. Y. Yoo
4. K. Seong
5. N. Kang
6. Tae Hoon Kim
7. Jae Seong Kim
8. W. Yih

In Environmental Chemistry

1. E. Granéli
2. U. Tillmann
3. H. Jeong
4. Y. Yoo
5. K. Seong
6. D. Stoecker
7. N. Kang
8. Jae Seong Kim

In Oceanography

1. E. Granéli
2. H. Jeong
3. D. Stoecker
4. Y. Yoo
5. U. Tillmann
6. K. Seong
7. N. Kang
8. Tae Hoon Kim

Citations in the corpus

• Phagotrophy in harmful algae (2006, background): “Most dinoflagellates and haptophytes can grow strictly autotrophically, but some species of dinoflagellates (for example, Karlodinium micrum, Cochlodinium polykrikoides, Gonyaulax polygramma, Lingulodinium polyedra) grow much faster with prey than strictly autotrophically (Li et al. 1999; Jeong et ”
• Selective feeding behaviour of key free-living protists: avenues for continued study (2008, background): “…Gonyaulax polygramma ingests smaller-sized prey by engulfment through its apical horn, while employing its sulcal area for larger-sized prey (Jeong et al. 2005), while Karlodinium armiger uses tube-feeding for larger or thecate prey and engulfment of prey or an incomplete extension of the…”
• The relative importance of microbial and classical food webs in a highly productive coastal upwelling area (2007, background): “Recent studies have stressed the potential importance of heterotrophic and mixotrophic dinoflagellates grazing pressure in the population dynamics of flagellate and diatoms (Jeong et al. 2005).”
• Growth, feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs (2010, background): “…dinoflagellates which had previously been thought to be exclusively autotrophic dinoflagellates have been revealed to be mixotrophic dinoflagellates (i.e. capable of both photosynthesis and ingesting prey) (Jacobson and Anderson 1996; Stoecker 1999; Jeong et al. 2005c, 2010; Seong et al. 2006).”
• A hierarchy of conceptual models of red-tide generation: Nutrition, behavior, and biological interactions (2015, background): “Interestingly, P. minimum and P. triestinum, which are able to feed on A. carterae and H. akashiwo, were ingested in turn by C. polykrikoides and P. micans (Jeong et al., 2004b, 2005a).”
• Control of the harmful alga Cochlodinium polykrikoides by the naked ciliate Strombidinopsis jeokjo in mesocosm enclosures (2008, background): “Recently, C. polykrikoides, which had previously been known as exclusively autotrophic, was revealed to be a mixotrophic dinoflagellate (Jeong et al., 2004c) capable of feeding on diverse prey items, including the cyanobacterium Synechococcus (Jeong et al., 2005d), heterotrophic bacteria (Seong et a”
• Feeding by phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates: five species newly revealed and six species previ- ously known to be mixotrophic (2005, methodology): “Before the present study, approximately 40 marine dinoflagellates have been reported to be mixotrophic (reviewed by Stoecker 1999, Jeong et al. 2004, 2005).”