Feeding by phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates: five species newly revealed and six species previ- ously known to be mixotrophic
By H. Jeong, Y. Yoo, Jae Yeon Park, Jae Yoon Song, Seong Taek Kim, Lee Seung Hyun, Kwang Young Kim, W. Yih. 2005
268 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f5c94377d2f605bb0e7c324d5831cdf0c7fb096
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Environmental Chemistry
- P. Glibert
- C. Gobler
- E. Granéli
- U. Tillmann
- J. Burkholder
- A. Cembella
- P. J. Hansen
- Raphael M. Kudela
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- The role of nutrients in regulation and promotion of harmful algal blooms in upwelling systems (2010, background): “Jeong et al. (2005a) demonstrated that all of 17 cultured red tide dinoflagellates tested fed mixotrophically on Synechococcus, strongly suggesting that mixotrophy is a common nutritional mode in these HAB organisms.”
- Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Examining linkages from selected coastal regions of the United States (2008, background): “Mixotrophy may also provide nutrients for K. brevis blooms (e.g., Bronk et al., 2004; Jeong et al., 2005a,b; Glibert et al., in press; Procise and Mulholland, submitted for publication), as described above for K. veneficum and Pfiesteria spp. Dissolved organic N (DON) concentrations in West Florida…”
- Mixotrophic Plankton in the Polar Seas: A Pan-Arctic Review (2018, unknown): “, 2016) Ingestion of small phytoplankton (Jeong et al., 2005);”
- Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms (HABs): Paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring and management (2012, background): “In a related strategy, some species obtain organic nutrients by ingesting detritus, bacteria, other phytoplankton, or even grazers (e.g., Jeong et al. 2005a,b).”
- Mixotrophic protists and a new paradigm for marine ecology: where does plankton research go now? (2019, background): “, 2003, 2012), Prorocentrum minimum (Johnson, 2015) and Heterocapsa triquetra (Jeong et al., 2005), while the latter include species such as Prymnesium (Skovgaard and Hansen, 2003; Carvalho and Granéli, 2010), Karlodinium (Berge et al.”
- Misuse of the phytoplankton-zooplankton dichotomy : the need to assign organisms as mixotrophs within plankton functional types (2013, background): “…actual organisms, the contributions of mixotrophs to system dynamics and functionality have been shown to be important (Stoecker et al., 1997; Jeong et al., 1999, 2005a, b, 2010a, b; Gisselson et al., 2002; Smalley et al., 2003; Zubkov and Tarran, 2008; Glibert et al., 2009; Rokitta et al.,…”
- Control of the harmful alga Cochlodinium polykrikoides by the naked ciliate Strombidinopsis jeokjo in mesocosm enclosures (2008, background): “Recently, C. polykrikoides, which had previously been known as exclusively autotrophic, was revealed to be a mixotrophic dinoflagellate (Jeong et al., 2004c) capable of feeding on diverse prey items, including the cyanobacterium Synechococcus (Jeong et al., 2005d), heterotrophic bacteria (Seong et a”
- A hierarchy of conceptual models of red-tide generation: Nutrition, behavior, and biological interactions (2015, background): “Interestingly, P. minimum and P. triestinum, which are able to feed on A. carterae and H. akashiwo, were ingested in turn by C. polykrikoides and P. micans (Jeong et al., 2004b, 2005a).”
- Growth, feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs (2010, background): “…dinoflagellates which had previously been thought to be exclusively autotrophic dinoflagellates have been revealed to be mixotrophic dinoflagellates (i.e. capable of both photosynthesis and ingesting prey) (Jacobson and Anderson 1996; Stoecker 1999; Jeong et al. 2005c, 2010; Seong et al. 2006).”
- The trophic roles of microzooplankton in marine systems (2008, background): “The feeding plasticity of this group allows them to ingest prey ranging in size from ca. 1 mm (Strom, 1991; Jeong et al., 2005a) to several times their body size (Figure 3; Lessard, 1991; Hansen, 1992; Strom and Strom, 1996; Saito et al., 2006; Sherr and Sherr, 2007).”