Age, gender, ethnicity and the digital divide: university students’ use of web‐based instruction

By Y. Enoch, Zeev Soker. 2006

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/125d058b62a283049bba8e0ce06c0b57ddb6c18d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Kwok Kee Wei
2. Bernard C. Y. Tan
3. Hock Hai Teo
4. Timothy Teo
5. Hock Chuan Chan
6. Hsiu-Fen Lin
7. Anitha Chennamaneni
8. Kimberly M. Christopherson

In Gender Studies

1. Xitao Fan
2. Jianxia Du
3. Bernard C. Y. Tan
4. Hock Hai Teo
5. Kwok Kee Wei
6. Timothy Teo
7. Hock Chuan Chan
8. Xiaoquan Pan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jianxia Du
2. Kwok Kee Wei
3. Bernard C. Y. Tan
4. Hock Hai Teo
5. Timothy Teo
6. Xitao Fan
7. Hock Chuan Chan
8. Hsiu-Fen Lin

Citations in the corpus

• Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide (2011, background): “Hence, we hypothesize: There is growing recognition of a digital divide between genders (Ching et al. 2005, Kennedy et al. 2003, Soker 2005).”
• Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter? (2015, background): “Moreover, as discussed by Colley and Comber (2003), and by Enoch and Soker (2006), gender groups did show some differences in terms of attitudes toward technology and technology use, and such gender difference in attitude about computer technology might be explained as an outcome of the…”