Awkward moments in interactions between nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals.

By M. Hebl, J. Tickle, Todd F. Heatherton. 2000

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1253a6d27427fead3010bb04093eec6db02ab5fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Howard Giles
2. Terry L. Schell
3. Kristin L. Drogos
4. Arjan E. R. Bos
5. Travis L. Dixon
6. Sarah E. Stutterheim
7. G. Reeder
8. J. Pryor

Citations in the corpus

• Stigma: Advances in Theory and Research (2013, background): “High levels of perceived severity evoke both anxiety and sympathy on the part of perceivers (Crandall & Moriarty, 1995; Feldman & Crandall, 2007; Van Alphen, Dijker, Bos, Van den Borne & Curfs, 2012), and the occurrence of both emotions simultaneously can yield emotional ambivalence and awkward inte”
• The Influence of Race in Police–Civilian Interactions: A Content Analysis of Videotaped Interactions Taken During Cincinnati Police Traffic Stops (2008, background): “This can lead to stigmatized individuals viewing all ambiguousness within an interaction as negative (Hebl et al., 2000).”