A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management

By C. Durach, J. Kembro, Andreas Wieland. 2017

791 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/122e5304474daaa60bd6bb30647d8cff295087f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda (2018, methodology): “…SLR – a type of structured appr ach to conducting a search (Denyer and Tranfield, 2009; Saenz and Koufteros, 2015) – that is consistent with the frameworks recently outlined in the operations and SCM literature by Thomé et al. (2016) and Durach et al. (2017) but more specific to the topic of SCRM.”
Information and digital technologies of Industry 4.0 and Lean supply chain management: a systematic literature review (2020, methodology): “The search engines used should correspond to the typical databases in the area of study (Okoli and Schabram 2010; Thomé, Scavarda, and Scavarda 2016; Durach, Kembro, and Wieland 2017).”
Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment (2021, background): “…inadequate selection criteria), selector bias (reviews based on subjective inclusion of studies based on author’s perceptions), within-study bias (variability in the coding of primary studies), and expectancy bias (author’s expectations about the results influence synthesis; Durach et al. 2017).”
Entrepreneurial Failure: A Synthesis and Conceptual Framework of its Effects (2020, methodology): “Given that review outputs are sensitive to biases of the researcher’s subjectivism (Durach et al., 2017), this stage was triangulated, that is, performed separately by three researchers independently, and then individual findings were discussed and integrated within the research team.”