Estimating patterns of reptile biodiversity in remote regions

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe (2014, background): “…or Tel-mee (www.telmee.nl), the feedback of the centrally collected data into the national databases, and especially, the review and scientiﬁc validation process before the contributed data are included in these databases (Boakes et al., 2010; Bonter and Cooper, 2012; Ficetola et al., 2013).”
An evaluation of the robustness of global amphibian range maps (2014, background): “distribution, richness and abundance, thus providing the information needed to set up conservation strategies (Grenyer et al., 2006; Finer et al., 2008; Lawler et al., 2010; Rondinini et al., 2011; Sandel et al., 2011; Hof et al., 2012; Ficetola et al., 2013).”
Atlas of Brazilian Snakes: Verified Point-Locality Maps to Mitigate the Wallacean Shortfall in a Megadiverse Snake Fauna (2019, background): “We did not include in our database records obtained from online digitized biodiversity data (GBIF, HerpNet, or similar data repositories), as these often contain raw, error-prone, unverified data, especially in poorly studied taxa (see Beck et al., 2013; Ficetola et al., 2013; Meyer et al., 2015).”