An evaluation of the robustness of global amphibian range maps

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Protected areas and spatial conservation priorities for endemic vertebrates of the Gran Chaco, one of the most threatened ecoregions of the world (2016, methodology): “Although the range maps were generated by experts in each taxonomic group and have been widely used previously in conservation planning (e.g. Faleiro & Loyola, 2013; Di Minin et al., 2016), they are known to vary in their levels of accuracy among regions (Ficetola et al., 2014).”
Atlas of Brazilian Snakes: Verified Point-Locality Maps to Mitigate the Wallacean Shortfall in a Megadiverse Snake Fauna (2019, background): “, 2018a), expertdrawn maps (Graham and Hijmans, 2006; Ficetola et al., 2014), and species distribution models (Elith et al.”
The challenges and opportunities of coexisting with wild ungulates in the human-dominated landscapes of Europe's Anthropocene (2019, unknown): “Moreover, it has already been noted that the IUCN species range maps lack precision at local scales (Ficetola et al., 2014).”