Bayes Optimal Multilabel Classification via Probabilistic Classifier Chains
By Krzysztof Dembczynski, Weiwei Cheng, Eyke Hüllermeier. 2010
506 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods, Statistical Learning Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
- David M. Blei
- Francisco J. R. Ruiz
- Michalis K. Titsias
- Adji Bousso Dieng
- Sebastian Nowozin
- Jianfei Cai
- Yew-Soon Ong
- Haitao Liu
In Statistical Learning Theory
- G. Holmes
- Yew-Soon Ong
- James T. Kwok
- Jianfei Cai
- Michalis K. Titsias
- Daniel Tarlow
- Bernhard Pfahringer
- Johannes Fürnkranz
Citations in the corpus
- Elucidating image-to-set prediction: An analysis of models, losses and datasets (2019, neutral): “In order to explicitly exploit label co-occurrences, researchers have resorted to modeling the joint probability distribution of labels [59] or decomposing the joint distribution into conditionals [11, 61, 45, 28, 32, 41, 46].”
- DeepCoder: Learning to Write Programs (2016, background): “Dembczynski et al. (2010) showed that in multi-label classification under a so-called Rank loss, it is Bayes optimal to rank the labels according to their marginal probabilities.”
- FIRST (2018, unknown): “Bayes estimators are probabilistic classifiers [9], the same type of the well-known Naïve Bayes classifier.”
- Large-Scale Multi-label Text Classification - Revisiting Neural Networks (2013, background): “In such cases, it is also intractable to employ methods that minimize ranking errors among labels [6, 31] or that learn joint probability distributions of labels [10, 3].”
- Probabilistic Multi-Label Classification with Sparse Feature Learning (2013, unknown): “…2006; Fuernkranz et al., 2008], pairwise label dependency methods [Zhu et al., 2005; Petterson and Caetano, 2011], probabilistic classifier chains [Dembczynski et al., 2010], large-margin methods [Guo and Schuurmans , 2011; Godbole and Sarawagi, 2004; Hariharan et al., 2010], and probabilistic…”
- On the Consistency of Multi-Label Learning (2011, unknown): “It is noteworthy that, after we published our preliminary work (Gao and Zhou, 2011), Dembczyński et al. (2012a) proved that the following surrogate losses are consistent w.”
- Efficient Multi-label Classification with Many Labels (2013, background): “In recent years, many approaches have been proposed to further improve classification performance by incorporating the label correlations (Dembczynski et al., 2010; Hariharan et al., 2010) or exploiting the label hierarchy (Bi & Kwok, 2011).”
- Improving Pairwise Ranking for Multi-label Image Classification (2017, background): “The Bayes consistency is an important property for a loss function to achieve the right objective [5, 24].”
- Augment and Reduce: Stochastic Inference for Large Categorical Distributions (2018, methodology): “They might replace the softmax transformation with a hierarchical or stickbreaking model (Kurzynski, 1988; Morin & Bengio, 2005; Tsoumakas et al., 2008; Beygelzimer et al., 2009; Dembczyński et al., 2010; Khan et al., 2012).”
- Remarks on multi-output Gaussian process regression (2018, background): “Besides, some theoretical insights [68, 69, 70] pointed out that the consideration of additional features to transform the training data helps SST and ERC reduce the model bias at the cost of increasing the model variance.”
- Maximizing Subset Accuracy with Recurrent Neural Networks in Multi-label Classification (2017, methodology): “[3] have proposed probabilistic classifier chain (PCC) which decomposes the joint probability into L conditional probabilities:”
- General Multi-label Image Classification with Transformers (2020, background): “(1) Conditional Prediction: The first type, autoregressive models [12, 41, 50, 37] estimate the true joint probability of output labels given the input by using the chain rule, predicting one label at a time.”
- A Literature Survey on Algorithms for Multi-label Learning (2010, methodology): “Notice that the analysis in this section is based on the experiments and results described in [52, 20, 69, 14, 68] with a few additional alignment experiments conducted.”
- Inverse Cooking: Recipe Generation From Food Images (2018, background): “Significant effort has been devoted in the literature to leverage deep neural networks for multi-label classification, by designing models [49, 8, 56, 37, 53] and studying loss functions [12] well suited for this task.”