Mutual information relevance networks: functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements.
By Atul J. Butte, I. Kohane. 1999
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Yoshua Bengio
- Jan Peters
- Sergey Levine
- Kun Zhang
- David Lopez-Paz
- Dacheng Tao
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Citations in the corpus
- Mutual Information Neural Estimation (2018, background): “…tasks, including biomedical sciences (Maes et al., 1997), blind source separation (BSS, e.g., independent component analysis, Hyv¨arinen et al., 2004), information bottleneck (IB, Tishby et al., 2000), feature selection (Kwak & Choi, 2002; Peng et al., 2005), and causality (Butte & Kohane, 2000).”
- Data Based Identification and Prediction of Nonlinear and Complex Dynamical Systems (2016, methodology): “In RELNET, a threshold τ is used to distinguish actual links from null connections.”
- Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells (2005, background): “, which combine data from a number of independent experimental clues; and statistical method”
- Next-Generation Machine Learning for Biological Networks. (2018, unknown): “The area has benefited from machine learning largely in the identification of network architectures (Butte and Kohane, 2000; Cahan et al., 2014; Faith et al., 2007; Friedman, 2004; Margolin et al., 2006).”
- A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. (2001, methodology): “Several clustering methods have been proposed: Most are excellent and have associated software packages that are publicly available (4, 23, 25, 36, 39, 57, 62, 118).”
- Equitability, mutual information, and the maximal information coefficient (2013, methodology): “medical imaging [38], and signal processing [39]. We also note that mutual information has been used by multiple groups to construct networks analogous to those constructed by Reshef et al. using MIC [3, 40, 41, 42, 43]. We emphasize, however, that all the diculties associated with estimating mutual”
- From patterns to pathways: gene expression data analysis comes of age (2002, background): “Even simple pairwise comparisons can indicate novel interactions 78 .”
- The mutual information: Detecting and evaluating dependencies between variables (2002, methodology): “This approach is not entirely new: An early attempt to use information-theoretic concepts in this context was given in (Michaels et al. , 1998), a more recent analysis was applied by Butte and Kohane (2000).”
- Genetic network inference: from co-expression clustering to reverse engineering (2000, background): “Section”
- Inferring cellular networks – a review (2007, background): “This problem can be addressed by using networks built from more flexible similarity measures like pair-wise mutual information [13], or non-linear kernel-functions [14].”
- Molecular ecological network analyses (2012, methodology): “Similar to relevant gene co-expression network analysis [20,61,85,86], the nodes are connected if they have significant pairwise similarities (i.”
- Inferring gene regulatory networks from gene expression data by path consistency algorithm based on conditional mutual information (2012, background): “Second, MI is more general than PCC to model the relations between genes, while PCC is more easily distorted when points are not uniformly distributed across the axes (Butte and Kohane, 2000).”