Lock-in and break-out from technological trajectories: Modeling and policy implications

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? (2010, background): “A stabilization along a trajectory can be hyper-stabilized (as in the case of “lock in”) or destabilized, meta-stabilized, and globalized into a regime by interacting with a third selection mechanism [14].”
Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society (2013, background): “…an overlay of recursive networks and organizations that reshape their institutional arrangements through reflexive sub-dynamics, such as markets and technological innovations (see, for example, Leydesdorff, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2006, 2008; Leydesdorff and Meyer, 2006; Dolfsma and Leydesdorff, 2009).”
Are regional systems greening the economy? Local spillovers, green innovations and firms’ economic performances (2016, background): “…equilibria may in fact undermine sustainability achievements since they brake new inventions and EIs diffusion (cf. Metcalfe 1997; Cantwell 2000; Dolfsma and Leydesdorff 2009, among others).5 For this reason, as recently stated by Cecere et al. (2014), a deeper comprehension of the local forces…”