Automatic and controlled processes in behavioural control: Implications for personality psychology

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Psychology of Middle Power: Vertical Code-Switching, Role Conflict, and Behavioral Inhibition (2017, methodology): “Like the BAS, the FFFS is considered to be “wellsuited to reacting to predictable stimuli from a pre-existing behavioural repertoire” (Corr, 2010: 385).”
The links between self-determined motivations and behavioral automaticity in a variety of real-life behaviors (2017, background): “Since behaviors that are not internalized are assumed to generate more internal conflict (guilt, frustration, rumination) than behaviors that are accepted and personally important, they should depend more on reflective processes as such internal conflict rely on reflective processes (Corr 2010; Staw”
Approach and Avoidance Behaviour: Multiple Systems and their Interactions (2013, unknown): “In an attempt to tackle this issue, Corr (2010) developed a model, based on a neuropsychological model of the functions of consciousness (Gray, 2004), which postulates that all behaviours (and related thoughts, feeling, etc.) are automatically organised and executed, without the immediate control…”
Cybernetic Big Five Theory. (2015, background): “Nonetheless, it is worth noting that some personality theories (starting long ago with psychodynamic theorists like Freud and Jung) have made the distinction between conscious and unconscious processes their central focus (e.g., Corr, 2010; Epstein, 2003).”