Modelling CO formation in the turbulent interstellar medium

By S. Glover, Christoph Federrath, M. Mac Low, Ralf Klessen. 2009

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results from high-resolution three-dimensional simulations of turbulent interstellar gas that self-consistently follow its coupled thermal, chemical and dynamical evolution, with a particular focus on the formation and destruction of H 2 and CO. We quantify the formation time-scales for H 2 and CO in physical conditions corresponding to those found in nearby giant molecular clouds, and show that both species form rapidly, with chemical time-scales that are comparable to the dynamical time-scale of the gas. We also investigate the spatial distributions of H 2 and CO, and how they relate to the underlying gas distribution. We show that H 2 is a good tracer of the gas distribution, but that the relationship between CO abundance and gas density is more complex. The CO abundance is not well-correlated with either the gas number density n or the visual extinction Av : both have a large influence on the CO abundance, but the inhomogeneous nature of the density field produced by the turbulence means that n and A v are only poorly correlated. There is a large scatter in A v , and hence CO abundance, for gas with any particular density, and similarly a large scatter in density and CO abundance for gas with any particular visual extinction. This will have important consequences for the interpretation of the CO emission observed from real molecular clouds. Finally, we also examine the temperature structure of the simulated gas. We show that the molecular gas is not isothermal. Most of it has a temperature in the range of 10-20 K, but there is also a significant fraction of warmer gas, located in low-extinction regions where photoelectric heating remains effective.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11d2480c61914ea5a55b04c296117bb2ad87ac50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Mark R. Krumholz
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Ralf Klessen
  4. S. Glover
  5. E. Ostriker
  6. D. Narayanan
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. T. Naab

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Ralf Klessen
  2. D. Narayanan
  3. S. Glover
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Christoph Federrath
  6. Mark R. Krumholz
  7. E. Ostriker
  8. P. C. Clark

Citations in the corpus