The density variance–Mach number relation in supersonic turbulence – I. Isothermal, magnetized gas

By F. Molina, S. Glover, Christoph Federrath, R. Lyon, Centre de Recherche Astrophysique, F. M. F. Astrophysics, School of Physical Sciences, Australia.. 2012

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

It is widely accepted that supersonic, magnetized turbulence plays a fundamental role for star formation in molecular clouds. It produces the initial dense gas seeds out of which new stars can form. However, the exact relation between gas compression, turbulent Mach number and magnetic field strength is still poorly understood. Here, we introduce and test an analytical prediction for the relation between the density variance and the rms Mach number in supersonic, isothermal, magnetized turbulent flows. We approximate the density and velocity structure of the interstellar medium as a superposition of shock waves. We obtain the density contrast considering the momentum equation for a single magnetized shock and extrapolate this result to the entire cloud. Depending on the field geometry, we then make three different assumptions based on observational and theoretical constraints: B independent of ρ, B∝ρ1/2 and B∝ρ. We test the analytically derived density variance–Mach number relation with numerical simulations, and find that for B∝ρ1/2, the variance in the logarithmic density contrast, , fits very well to simulated data with turbulent forcing parameter b= 0.4, when the gas is super-Alfvenic. However, this result breaks down when the turbulence becomes trans-Alfvenic or sub-Alfvenic, because in this regime the turbulence becomes highly anisotropic. Our density variance–Mach number relations simplify to the purely hydrodynamic relation as the ratio of thermal to magnetic pressure β0∞.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18534a132599e0a76a97402d6e136f419058967d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Ralf Klessen
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Christoph Federrath
  4. Mark R. Krumholz
  5. P. Hennebelle
  6. S. Glover
  7. A. Dekel
  8. Frédéric Bournaud

In Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes

  1. Ralf Klessen
  2. Christoph Federrath
  3. D. Ward-Thompson
  4. P. Hennebelle
  5. E. Falgarone
  6. S. Glover

Citations in the corpus