Research, part of a Special Feature on Effects of Roads and Traffic on Wildlife Populations and Landscape Function Behavioral Responses of Northern Leopard Frogs (Rana pipiens) to Roads and Traffic:…

By Julie Bouchard, A. Ford, Felix Eigenbrod, L. Fahrig. 2009

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A key goal in road ecology is to determine which species are most vulnerable to the negative effects of roads on population persistence. Theory suggests that species that avoid roads are less likely to be negatively affected by roads than those that do not avoid roads. The goal of this study was to take a step toward testing this prediction by evaluating the behavioral response to roads and traffic of a species whose populations are known to be negatively affected by roads and traffic, the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens). We studied the movement patterns of northern leopard frogs during their spring migration from overwintering sites in a river to various breeding ponds that were disconnected from the river by roads. We performed short-distance translocations of migrating frogs, followed them visually, and documented their movement coordinates following each hop, both near the roads and in non-roaded areas. We found that frogs took longer to move near roads with more traffic and that their movement was quickest in areas without roads nearby. Frogs tended to deviate more from a straight-line course when they were released near roads than compared with control areas, but this response was independent of traffic volume. All frogs released near roads attempted to cross the road. On very low traffic roads (10.86 mean vehicles per hour), 94% of frogs crossed the road successfully, whereas at higher traffic roads (58.29 mean vehicles per hour) 72% were successful. Our results suggest that frog's inability to avoid going onto roads and their slow movement combine to make them particularly vulnerable to road mortality, which likely explains the strong negative effects of roads on frog population abundance. Conservation efforts should focus on preventing frogs from accessing the road surface through the use of drift fencing and culverts.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11b0af5d6e559a741c78a4ddb3b71251c66dcc41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Relative effects of road mortality and decreased connectivity on population genetic diversity (2011, background): “Significant proportions of crossing attempts result in death in a variety of organisms (e.g., Bouchard et al., 2009; Freeman, 2010; McCall et al., 2010; Row et al., 2007; Soluk, 2011) and roads are thought to be the largest cause of mortality in several medium to large-sized vertebrates (reviewed…”
Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis (2012, background): “For species that are mainly affected by roads through road mortality, such as amphibians (Fahrig et al., 1995; Bouchard et al., 2009), reptiles (Boarman and Sazaki, 2006; Tanner and Perry, 2007), some birds (Summers et al., 2011), and some larger mammals (Fuller, 1989; Ferreras et al., 1992),…”