Comparison of echolocation behaviour between coastal and riverine porpoises

By T. Akamatsu, J. Teilmann, Lee A. Miller, Jakob Tougaard, Rune Dietz, Ding Wang, Ke‐Xiong Wang, Ursula Siebert, Yasuhiko Naito. Symposium on Underwater Technology and Workshop on Scientific Use of Submarine Cables and Related Technologies, 2007

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11aa2f56667ad2d3fc05bc0ed79f731616dde7cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Ecology

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zone; a compilation (2011, background): “Free-swimming porpoises in the wild have been shown to vocalize almost constantly (Akamatsu et al 2005, 2007), meaning that the chosen measurements of acoustic activity can be used as an indicator of the number of porpoises present.”
Population status, threats and conservation of the Yangtze finless porpoise (2009, background): “Echolo-cation signals generated by the two species are also very different in terms of time and frequency characteristics [22,24 − 37] These unique acoustical properties make it possible to identify which species is vocalizing by recording them in the wild. early as in 1998, we developed the first…”
Diel echolocation activity of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) around North Sea offshore gas installations (2009, background): “Those authors reported higher porpoise echolocation-detection rates at night than by day, for both playback and control conditions. Conversely, Cox and Read (2004) later report that four PODs (version not specified), also stationed in the Bay of Fundy, recorded a higher echolocation rate, number of ”
Studying the behaviour and sensory ecology of marine mammals using acoustic recording tags: a review (2009, background): “Because of their low source level (Madsen et al. 2005), buzzes may be difficult to detect in remote recordings for some species or when using automatic click detectors (Akamatsu et al. 2007), but they are usually straightforward to detect in acoustic tag recordings.”