Diel echolocation activity of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) around North Sea offshore gas installations

By Victoria L. G. Todd, W. Pearse, N. Tregenza, Paul Lepper, I. Todd. 2009

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Todd, V. L. G., Pearse, W. D., Tregenza, N. C., Lepper, P. A., and Todd, I. B. 2009. Diel echolocation activity of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) around North Sea offshore gas installations. - ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 734-745.Echolocation clicks of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) were detected with T-PODs, autonomous, passive, acoustic-monitoring devices, deployed from an offshore-exploration-drilling-rig and gas-production-platform complex in the Dogger Bank region of the North Sea from 2005 to 2006. Echolocation-click trains were categorized into four phases of the diel cycle: morning, day, evening, and night. Porpoises were present near (<200 m) the platform, and there was a pronounced diel pattern in echolocation activity; the number of porpoise encounters (visits) was greater by night than by day. The number of click trains with a minimum inter-click interval of <10 ms also increased at night. This was confirmed by a comparison of the ratios of feeding buzzes to search-phase clicks (feeding buzz ratios) and an analysis of the changes in pulse-repetition frequencies within each train. A reasonable interpretation of this pattern was that porpoises were feeding below or around the platform at night. The evidence for changes in activity during the morning and evening was less clear, so these may be transitional phases. The pattern of porpoise-echolocation behaviour around this platform is related most probably to the diel activity of their prey. If porpoises cluster regularly around such installations within 500-m shipping exclusion zones, they may be omitted from population surveys. We conclude that offshore installations may play an important role as nocturnal porpoise-feeding stations in an overfished environment, but that further replicated and controlled studies are required. These findings should be taken into consideration during offshore-installation-decommissioning decisions in the North Sea.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f61957b1ab8c8fec2063171f42f329274506d35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Cooke
2. S. Hinch
3. A. Fisk
4. S. Iverson
5. C. Suski
6. R. Scheibling
7. J. Kelly
8. M. Donaldson

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Cooke
2. S. Hinch
3. A. Fisk
4. S. Iverson
5. M. Stokesbury
6. D. Patterson
7. A. Danylchuk
8. A. Farrell

In Oceanography

1. A. Fisk
2. S. Iverson
3. S. Cooke

Citations in the corpus

• Ocean Tracking Network Canada: A Network Approach to Addressing Critical Issues in Fisheries and Resource Management with Implications for Ocean Governance (2011, background): “…vocalizations (see Delarue et al. 2009), and four C-PODs (Chelonia Limited, Cornwall, UK), which record clicks produced by odontocete whales (see Todd et al. 2009), were also placed in the north end of Cumberland Sound in 2010 to understand the movements, behaviors, and population structure of…”