Conversation and Cognition: Using participants' video-stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices
By Anita M. Pomerantz. 2005
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1195824da9ed636b014a11325c0b4129a2895499
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Michael Haugh
- Jonathan Potter
- Wolff‐Michael Roth
- Lilla Vicsek
- D. Harper
- D. Edwards
- A. Hepburn
- I. Parker
In Language and Linguistics
- Michael Haugh
- Jonathan Potter
- Wolff‐Michael Roth
- D. Harper
- Lilla Vicsek
- A. Hepburn
- D. Edwards
- Alexander J. Kent
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Making psychology relevant (2005, background): “For example, in recent discussions Drew (2005), Heritage (2005) and Pomerantz (2005) in different ways attempt to link interactional phenomena to underlying cognitive states rather than following a DP approach of understanding putatively cognitive phenomena in interactional terms.”
- The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative (2007, background): “…only this time the interaction is with the analyst” (Mills 2003: 45), which makes such evaluations a useful resource for the analyst at times (Pomerantz 2005), but does by no means give us unequivocal insight, since these post facto evaluations do not necessarily reliably reflect evaluations…”