Denali: Lightweight Virtual Machines for Distributed and Networked Applications
By Andrew Whitaker, Marianne Shaw, S. Gribble. 2001
335 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11928ecc96f52e153f6a3bf5143260f15f7c4dfd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- C. Hoffa
- Wei Huang
- Gaurang Mehta
- Ewa Deelman
- T. Freeman
- Yun Fu
- Jiuxing Liu
- B. Abali
Citations in the corpus
- GreenCloud: a new architecture for green data center (2009, methodology): “Hence, VM platform can facilitate server-consolidation and co-located hosting facilities [4][5][7].”
- High performance network virtualization with SR-IOV (2010, unknown): “Paravirtualization (PV) [27] requires OS modification to work cooperatively with VMM.”
- High Performance VMM-Bypass I/O in Virtual Machines (2006, methodology): “It uses para-virtualization [43], in which host operating systems need to be explicitly ported to the Xen architecture.”
- SHARP: an architecture for secure resource peering (2003, background): “vservers [42] to create lightweight virtual machines, though virtual machine technology is an active area of research [21, 44, 47].”
- A case for grid computing on virtual machines (2003, methodology): “The Denali project [36] is similar to ours in that it has a similar objective of providing network-based services based on VMs.”
- On the Use of Cloud Computing for Scientific Workflows (2008, background): “Denali [31], IBM rHype [32], and Xen utilize paravirtualization for decreased overhead and potentially higher performance, but paravirtualization is limited in that it can only host specially modified operating systems.”