SHARP: an architecture for secure resource peering

By Yun Fu, Jeffrey S. Chase, Brent N. Chun, S. Schwab, Amin Vahdat. Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 2003

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Survey of Solutions to the Sybil Attack (2006, unknown): “[74] among others [3, 10,11,13,14,17,27,31,34,37,45,52,60,64,68,73]”
Tycoon: An implementation of a distributed, market-based resource allocation system (2004, unknown): “[14]) provides the distributed infrastructure to manage tickets, but not the mechanism or agent strategies.”
Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility (2009, background): “Recently, many research projects such as SHARP [20], Tycoon [21], Bellagio [22], and Shirako [23] have come up with market structures for trading in resource allocations.”
Operating Systems Support for Planetary-Scale Network Services (2004, methodology): “To illustrate this distinction, we point out that both the Globus grid toolkit and the account management system of the Emulab testbed [42] have been implemented above PlanetLab, as have more service-oriented frameworks like SHARP [17] .”
A Self-Organizing Flock of Condors (2003, unknown): “A ticket-and-lease based advance reservation of resources layered on p2p mechanisms is proposed in SHARP [19].”