Galaxies at z ~ 6: The UV Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density from 506 HUDF, HUDF Parallel ACS Field, and GOODS i-Dropouts

By R. Bouwens, G. Illingworth, M. Franx, J. Blakeslee. 2005

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have detected 506 i-dropouts (z ~ 6 galaxies) in deep, wide-area HST ACS fields: HUDF, enhanced GOODS, and HUDF parallel ACS fields (HUDF-Ps). The contamination levels are ≲8% (i.e., ≳92% are at z ~ 6). With these samples, we present the most comprehensive, quantitative analyses of z ~ 6 galaxies yet and provide optimal measures of the UV luminosity function (LF) and luminosity density at z ~ 6, and their evolution to z ~ 3. We redetermine the size and color evolution from z ~ 6 to z ~ 3. Field-to-field variations (cosmic variance), completeness, flux, and contamination corrections are modeled systematically and quantitatively. After corrections, we derive a rest-frame continuum UV (~1350 Å) LF at z ~ 6 that extends to M1350,AB ~ -17.5 (0.04L). There is strong evidence for evolution of the LF between z ~ 6 and z ~ 3, most likely through a brightening (0.6 ± 0.2 mag) of M* (at 99.7% confidence), although the degree depends on the faint-end slope. As expected from hierarchical models, the most luminous galaxies are deficient at z ~ 6. Density evolution (ϕ*) is ruled out at >99.99% confidence. Despite large changes in the LF, the luminosity density at z ~ 6 is similar to (0.82 ± 0.21 times) that at z ~ 3. Changes in the mean UV color of galaxies from z ~ 6 to z ~ 3 suggest an evolution in dust content, indicating that the true evolution is substantially larger: at z ~ 6 the star formation rate density is just ~30% of the z ~ 3 value. Our UV LF is consistent with z ~ 6 galaxies providing the necessary UV flux to reionize the universe.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/118749f476d4fff17f624e5cd6bf3d4e6272d395

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. M. Franx
  5. R. Bouwens
  6. P. V. van Dokkum
  7. G. Illingworth
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

In Instrumentation

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. M. Franx
  3. R. Bouwens
  4. P. V. van Dokkum
  5. G. Illingworth
  6. Christopher J. Conselice
  7. I. Labbé
  8. J. Dunlop

Citations in the corpus