ENHANCING ADHERENCE TO RISK‐NEEDRESPONSIVITY: MAKING QUALITY A MATTER OF POLICY
By Demetra Andrews. 2006
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/117b9d3c230fd0db5cae7ce7a85fcfbb277f0ec3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Turanovic
- J. Wormith
- Travis C. Pratt
- J. Bonta
- Demetra Andrews
- S. Wormith
- Duyen Luong
- Kristy Holtfreter
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision (2008, background): “…integrity of service delivery within corrections have been noted by others (e.g., Harris et al., 2004) and it has been especially problematic when trying to apply the principles of Risk, Need and Responsivity (Andrews, 2006; Lowenkamp, Latessa & Holsinger, 2006; Lowenkamp, Latessa, & Smith, 2006).”
- The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, result): “The large-scale application of treatment to large numbers of offenders has been problematic in their zeal to adhere to the need principle, and we believe that this is now reflected in some of the outcome studies of these large programs (Andrews, 2006).”
- Applying Risk/Need Assessment to Probation Practice and its Impact on the Recidivism of Young Offenders (2011, methodology): “The LS instruments include a commonly derived collection of risk/need scales based on the psychology of criminal conduct (Andrews & Bonta, 2006, 2010; Andrews et al., 2006) and are designed to reflect the RNR model. They have evolved over time and have been adapted for both young and adult offenders”
- “Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop”: Self-Control, Risky Lifestyles, and Repeat Victimization (2012, background): “…characteristics throughout all aspects of behavioral intervention (e.g., modeling, graduated practice, reinforcement, cognitive restructuring), where services are designed to fit individual cognitive levels and personality styles (Andrews 2006; Andrews and Bonta 2010; Andrews et al. 2006).”
- Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. (2010, background): “First, low-risk offenders should have minimal contact with higher-risk offenders (Andrews, 2006).”