On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections

By H. Cremades, V. Bothmer. 2004

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1177c08527a46d8d22d820fc1a3d84ddbf23968d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. T. Howard
2. A. Vourlidas
3. D. Webb
4. S. Gibson
5. S. Patsourakos
6. A. Thernisien
7. M. Temmer
8. Nat Gopalswamy

Citations in the corpus

• Coronal Mass Ejections: Observations (2012, background): “There is a large range in the basic properties of CMEs, although some of this scatter is likely due to imaging projection effects (e.g., Burkepile et al., 2004; Cremades and Bothmer, 2004).”
• AUTOMATED LASCO CME CATALOG FOR SOLAR CYCLE 23: ARE CMEs SCALE INVARIANT? (2008, background): “As reported by Cremades & Bothmer (2004) deflections towards the equator are maximal during solar minimum years due to the presence of the polar coronal holes.”
• Space Weather: The Solar Perspective (2006, background): “Note that width and source latitude are severely affected by projection effects (Burkepile et al., 2004; Cremades and Bothmer, 2004).”
• The Calm before the Storm: The Link between Quiescent Cavities and Coronal Mass Ejections (2006, background): “…based on those of Gibson et al. (2003) to examine how cavity visibility is likely to depend on cavity size, neutral line orientation, and other line-ofsight projection effects (see also Cremades & Bothmer 2004 for a discussion on line-of-sight projection and neutral-line orientation effects).”
• NO TRACE LEFT BEHIND: STEREO OBSERVATION OF A CORONAL MASS EJECTION WITHOUT LOW CORONAL SIGNATURES (2009, background): “For the majority of CMEs, especially fast ones, it is generally easy to identify a number of associated low coronal and chromospheric signatures.”
• Long-duration magnetic clouds: a comparison of analyses using torus- and cylinder-shaped flux rope models (2007, background): “, 2003), and (3) the relationships between the magnetic field structures of MCs and the corresponding coronal magnetic structures (Marubashi, 1986, 1997; Ishibashi and Marubashi, 2004; Cremades and Bothmer, 2004).”
• Coronal prominence structure and dynamics: A magnetic flux rope interpretation (2006, background): “Prominence Eruption [13] Observations of coronal mass ejections and erupting prominences are commonly interpreted as magnetic flux ropes [Dere et al., 1998; Plunkett et al., 2000; Cremades and Bothmer, 2004].”
• Modeling of Flux Rope Coronal Mass Ejections (2006, methodology): “Cremades for providing all the information concerning her work published in (Cremades and Bothmer 2004) and for her precious help that greatly improved this manuscript.”
• IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GRADUATED CYLINDRICAL SHELL MODEL FOR THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS (2011, background): “Another important property of CMEs is that they tend to expand self-similarly (Chen et al. 1997, 2000; Cremades & Bothmer 2004; Chen et al. 2006).”
• Characteristics of EUV Coronal Jets Observed with STEREO/SECCHI (2009, background): “It seems likely that the overall magnetic topology depends on the source region characteristics of the underlying photospheric magnetic field as in the case of large-scale CMEs found to arise from bipolar magnetic field regions on larger scale as shown by Cremades and Bothmer (2004).”