Comparative analysis of policy networks in Western Europe

By Hanspeter Kriesi, S. Adam, Margit Jochum. 2006

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance (2007, unknown): “For instance, according to a comparative study of three policy sectors in seven European democracies (Kriesi et al. 2006: 354), state actors remain the most powerful group in policy-making.”
Accountability and Multi-level Governance: More Accountability, Less Democracy? (2010, unknown): “Vol. 33, No. 5, 1030–1049, September 2010 ISSN 0140-2382 Print/1743-9655 Online ª 2010 Taylor & Francis DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2010.486126 networks, the paradigmatic case of a consensus democracy’ (Kriesi et al. 2006: 350).”
Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints (2008, background): “2006 ), and frequently, policy assessment processes become legal exercises because many strategic parameters are already set through EU directives.”
Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers (2013, background): “Many organised interests act through coalitions in order to seek influence (Sabatier 1988; Zafonte and Sabatier 1998; Hula 1999; Beyers and Kerremans 2004; Kriesi et al. 2006).”