Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints

By J. Turnpenny, Mans Nilsson, D. Russel, A. Jordan, J. Hertin, Björn Nykvist. 2008

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67c35f19714f0d57f5a4748c396e4c1ba41af64c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. A. Jordan
2. Michael Howlett
3. Björn Nykvist
4. C. Radaelli
5. J. Turnpenny

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Michael Howlett
2. A. Jordan
3. Björn Nykvist
4. J. Tosun
5. A. Lang
6. C. Radaelli
7. M. Scipioni
8. Daniel S. Schiff

In Public Administration

1. J. Tosun
2. A. Lang
3. Michael Howlett
4. C. Radaelli
5. M. Scipioni
6. Ishan Mukherjee
7. J. J. Woo

Citations in the corpus

• Policy analytical capacity: The supply and demand for policy analysis in government (2015, background): “Whether or not, and to what degree, government and non-governmental policy actors in a policy analytical community have the capacity to actually fulfil these tasks, for example, is an ongoing area of research (Turnpenny et al., 2008; Turnpenny, Radaelli, Jordan, & Jacob, 2009).”
• THE POLICY AND POLITICS OF POLICY APPRAISAL: EMERGING TRENDS AND NEW DIRECTIONS (2009, result): “Although some studies hint at the importance of the latter (e.g. Torriti 2007; de Ridder et al. 2007; Turnpenny et al. 2008; Jacob et al. 2008; Thiel and König 2008), most do not examine them in great detail.”
• Policy integration: mapping the different concepts (2017, background): “follow the template by Turnpenny et al. (2009) and assess the insights offered by the literature against the following guiding questions: What is the motivation for policy-makers to promote policy integration? What is the design of the instruments used for policy inte-”
• Rationalising the Policy Mess? Ex Ante Policy Assessment and the Utilisation of Knowledge in the Policy Process (2009, background): “The strength and type of constraints varied but tended to include preexisting political commitments, legal requirements, and the views of powerful stakeholders, public opinion, and existing legal and institutional frameworks (Turnpenny et al, 2008).”
• Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice (2017, unknown): “The implications of our findings for future practice are that increasing the use of ecosystem service knowledge in planning and policy-making practices requires support on micro, meso and macro level (see Turnpenny et al., 2008).”