Institutional Perspectives on Entrepreneurial Behavior in Challenging Environments

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises (2018, unknown): “Not surprising, work on SE at the institutional level of analysis thus often draws on an institutional theory perspective and suggests that the decision to engage in (social) entrepreneurial activities is largely determined by the institutions in which it occurs (Welter & Smallbone, 2011).”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “13 For instance: Bruton et al. (2010), Thornton et al. (2011), Veciana and Urbano (2008), Welter and Smallbone (2008, 2011), among others. and economic development; (b) given the capacity and efficiency to create norms and laws, entrepreneurial activity will increase or decrease; and therefore (c)…”
Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda (2020, background): “For a full understanding of the emergence and growth of SE, one needs to understand the influence of the surrounding environment on SE and SE’s impact on its environment (Grimes, Gehman, & Cao, 2018; Urban, 2013; Welter & Smallbone, 2011).”
The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame? (2014, background): “As this study was based within a formal institution, the behaviour of entrepreneurs was influenced and shaped by the appropriateness and operation of formal institutions (Welter and Smallbone 2011).”